Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

News and arrangements

2nd July 2021

SESS is now offering an online ALMaSS course 

        

ALMaSS: A systems simulation approach to environmental & wildlife management  

This course will provide you with a basic overview of ALMaSS and its components and show you where to start to create species models or new landscapes. The course is held the 18-22nd of October 2021.

The course is a 2+2 ECTS PhD course.

Read more and sign up here.

We are looking forward to share the world of ALMaSS with you!  

         

15th July 2021

Final EFSA research project report published

        

Research project on field data collection for honey bee colony model evaluation

EFSA research project report on field data collection for honey bee model evaluation is now published. 

The project was lead by SESS member Senior Researcher Yoko L. Dupont, and was designed for development and calibration of the honey bee colony simulation model, ApisRAM

The project data is also included in The EU Bee Partnership's (EUBP) new online data platform which will support the effort to protect bee and pollinator health.

Read the final EFSA report here, and read more about the new online EUBP data platform here.  

SESS centre authors

Yoko L. Dupont
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


Paulo Sousa
Department of Life Sciences,
The Centre for Functional Ecology,
Coimbra University, PT


Nuno Capela
Department of Life Sciences,
The Centre for Functional Ecology,
Coimbra University, PT


Joana Alves
Department of Life Sciences,
The Centre for Functional Ecology,
Coimbra University, PT


Geoffrey B. Groom
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


António Silva
Department of Life Sciences,
The Centre for Functional Ecology,
Coimbra University, PT


25th June 2021

The SESS team is hosting the B-GOOD CM5  
        

The 5th B-GOOD Consortium Meeting held the 28-30th June 2021 is hosted virtually by the SESS team

The B-GOOD CM5 will provide an interactive online conference which will provide floor for the demonstration of the ongoing research and showcasing progress, as well as promote cooperation between B-GOOD participants. The SESS team are looking forward to hosting the event!

Read more about the B-GOOD project.


24th June 2021

Article about the SESS centre in the DCE Årsberetning 2020 (in Danish)  
        

Internationalt forskningscenter for simulering af socio-økologiske systemer 

The recently published 2020 edition of the Danish Centre for Environment and Energy annual report (DCE - Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi) holds an article about SESS centre. It describes the SESS centre work approach, aim, current use and the potential future impacts.   

Read the article on page 9.


15th June 2021

SESS project funded by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency 
        

Implementation and communication of multiple-stressor environmental risk assessment for bees (MUSBERA) 

Project participants: Yoko L. Dupont, Xiaodong Duan, Christopher J. Topping, James H. Williams, Per Kryger, Elżbieta Ziółkowska, Agnieszka J. Bednarska

The MUSBERA project has been funded by the Pesticide and Biocide Research Program of the Danish EPA. 

The Pesticide and Biocide Research Program aims to contribute to the minimisation of the use of pesticides and the reduction of sideeffects on human health or the environment from the applications of pesticides. 

The MUSBERA project contributes to the development of environmental risk assessment regulatory scenarios for bees using the MUST-B approach (“A systems-based approach to the environmental risk assessment of MUltiple STressors in honey Bees”, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)), and evaluating the performance of ALMaSS models; ApisRAM and Osmia model in Denmark.

SESS centre participants

Yoko L. Dupont
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


Xiaodong Duan
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


Christopher J. Topping
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,

Aarhus University, DK


James H. Williams
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


Luna K. Marcussen
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,

Aarhus University, DK


Elżbieta Ziółkowska
Institute of Environmental Sciences,
Jagelloinan University, PL


Agnieszka J. Bednarska
Institute of Nature Conservation,
Polish Academy of Science, PL


28th April 2021

SESS involved article published in PLOS ONE
        

Evaluating competition for forage plants between honey bees and wild bees in Denmark

Claus Rasmussen, Yoko L. Dupont, Henning B. Madsen, Petr Bogusch, Dave Goulson, Lina Herbertsson, Kate Pereira Maia, Anders Nielsen, Jens M. Olesen, Simon G. Potts, Stuart P. M. Roberts, Markus A. K. Sydenham, Per Kryger

 
Abstract

A recurrent concern in nature conservation is the potential competition for forage plants between wild bees and managed honey bees. Specifically, that the highly sophisticated system of recruitment and large perennial colonies of honey bees quickly exhaust forage resources leading to the local extirpation of wild bees. However, different species of bees show different preferences for forage plants. We here summarize known forage plants for honey bees and wild bee species at national scale in Denmark. Our focus is on floral resources shared by honey bees and wild bees, with an emphasis on both threatened wild bee species and foraging specialist species. Across all 292 known bee species from Denmark, a total of 410 plant genera were recorded as forage plants. These included 294 plant genera visited by honey bees and 292 plant genera visited by different species of wild bees. Honey bees and wild bees share 176 plant genera in Denmark. Comparing the pairwise niche overlap for individual bee species, no significant relationship was found between their overlap and forage specialization or conservation status. Network analysis of the bee-plant interactions placed honey bees aside from most other bee species, specifically the module containing the honey bee had fewer links to any other modules, while the remaining modules were more highly inter-connected. Despite the lack of predictive relationship from the pairwise niche overlap, data for individual species could be summarized. Consequently, we have identified a set of operational parameters that, based on a high foraging overlap (>70%) and unfavorable conservation status (Vulnerable+Endangered+Critically Endangered), can guide both conservation actions and land management decisions in proximity to known or suspected populations of these species.

Find the article here: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250056

SESS centre authors

Yoko L. Dupont
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,  
Aarhus University, DK


26th February 2021

SESS letter published in Science
        

Holistic environmental risk assessment for bees 

Christopher John Topping, Mark Brown, Jordan Chetcuti, Joachim R. de Miranda, Francesco Nazzi, Peter Neumann, Robert J. Paxton, Maj Rundlöf, Jane C. Stout

 

Find the letter here: doi.org/10.1126/science.abg9622

SESS centre authors

Christopher J. Topping
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,
  

Aarhus University, DK


Jordan Chetcuti
Department of Botany,
School of Natural Sciences,
Trinity College Dublin, IR


Jane C. Stout
Department of Botany,
School of Natural Sciences,
Trinity College Dublin, IR


11th February 2021

SESS article published in Science of the Total Environment 
        

Supporting non-target arthropods in agroecosystems: Modelling effects of insecticides and landscape structure on carabids in agricultural landscapes

Elżbieta Ziółkowska, Christopher J. Topping, Agnieszka J. Bednarska, Ryszard Laskowski

 
Abstract

Intensification of agricultural practices is one of the most important drivers of the dramatic decline of arthropod species. We do not know, however, the relative contribution to decline of different anthropogenic stressors that are part of this process. We used high-resolution dynamic landscape models and advanced spatially-explicit population modelling to estimate the relative importance of insecticide use and landscape structure for population dynamics of a widespread carabid beetle Bembidion lampros. The effects of in-crop mitigation measures through the application of insecticides with reduced lethality, and off-crop mitigation measures by increasing abundance of grassy field margins, were evaluated for the beetle along the gradient of landscape heterogeneity. Reducing the insecticide-driven lethality (from 90 to 10%) had larger positive impacts on beetle density and occupancy than increasing the abundance of field margins in a landscape. The effects of increasing field margins depended on their width and overall abundance in the landscape, but only field margins 4 m wide, applied to at least 40% of fields, resulted in an increase in beetle population density comparable to the scenario with the smallest reduction of insecticide-driven lethality we considered. Our findings suggest the importance of field margins rather as a supporting not stand-alone mitigation measure, as they generally improved effects of reduction of insecticide-driven lethality. Therefore, adding sufficiently broad off-field habitats should help to maintain viable beetle populations in agricultural landscapes even with moderate use of insecticides. In general, the less persistent the insecticides are in the environment, the larger positive impacts of applied mitigation measures on beetle populations were found. We also showed that the effectiveness of applied mitigation measures strongly depends on landscape and farmland heterogeneity. Thus, to achieve the same management or mitigation target in different landscapes might require different strategies.

Find the article here: doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145746

SESS centre authors

Elżbieta Ziółkowska
Institute of Environmental Sciences,
Jagelloinan University, PL


Christopher J. Topping
Department of Bioscience,
Biodiversity and Conservation,

Aarhus University, DK


Agnieszka J. Bednarska
Institute of Nature Conservation,
Polish Academy of Science, PL


Ryszard Laskowski
Institute of Environmental Sciences,
Jagelloinan University, PL


10th December 2020

SESS centre launch
       

The centre was launched using an open zoom meeting.

Below is a link to a YouTube video of the launch meeting.

Thank you to all who attended and best wishes for all our future collaborations.

/Chris

Visninger