Relevant Litterature

In relation to the MARCHES project, this is list of relevant and related literature:

Alberini and Ščasný 2021. On the validity of the estimates of the VSL from contingent valuation: Evidence from the Czech Republic, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 62(1) 55-87.

Alberini and Ščasný 2018. The benefits of avoiding cancer (or dying from cancer): Evidence from a four-country study, Journal of Health Economics 57: 249-262.

Andersen et al. 2011. Monetary valuation with impact pathway analysis: Benefits of reducing nitrate leaching in European catchments, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 5: 199–244.

Anenberg et al. 2016. Survey of Ambient Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment Tools. Risk Analysis 36: 1718-1736;

Benavides et al. 2021. On the impact of excess diesel NOx emissions upon NO2 pollution in a compact city. Environmental Research Letters 16;

Brandt et al. 2013. Contribution from the ten major emission sectors in Europe to the Health-Cost Externalities of Air Pollution using the EVA Model System – an integrated modelling approach. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 7725-7746;

Brandt et al. 2013. Assessment of Past, Present and Future Health-Cost Externalities of Air Pollution in Europe and the contribution from international ship traffic using the EVA Model System. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 7747-7764.

Carthy et al. 1998. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2-The CV/SG “chained” approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17: 187-213.

Christensen 1997. The Danish Eulerian hemispheric model - A three-dimensional air pollution model used for the Arctic, Atmos. Environ., 31, 4169-4191.

Desaigues et al., 2011. Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of life year (VOLY). Ecological Indicators 11(3) 902-910.

European Commission 2014. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, Luxembourg.

Geels et al. 2021. Projections of shipping emissions and the related impact on air pollution and human health in the Nordic region, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21: 12495–12519;

Guevara et al. 2019. HERMESv3, a stand-alone multi-scale atmospheric emission modelling framework – Part 1: global and regional module, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1885–1907;

Guevara et al. 2020. HERMESv3, a stand-alone multi-scale atmospheric emission modelling framework – Part 2: The bottom–up module, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 873-903.

Hansen et al. 2017. Groundwater nitrate response to sustainable nitrogen management, Nature 7: 8566.

Hammitt and Haninger 2017. Valuing nonfatal health risk as a function of illness severity and duration: Benefit transfer using QALYs, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 82: 17–38.

Im et al. 2018. Assessment and economic valuation of air pollution impacts on human health over Europe and the United States as calculated by a multi-model ensemble in the framework of AQMEII3, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18: 5967-5989

Jensen et al. 2018. Development in air quality and health effects for 2020 and 2030 in relation to the National Program for Reduction of Air Pollution (NAPCP). [with English summary]. Aarhus University, DCE – Danish Centre For Environment and Energy, dce2.au.dk/pub/SR300.pdf

Johnston et al. 2017. Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4: 319–405; Johnston et al. 2021. Guidance to Enhance the Validity and Credibility of Environmental Benefit Transfers. Environmental and Resource Economics. June 1-50. 

Lehtomaki et al. 2020. Deaths Attributable to Air Pollution in Nordic Countries: Disparities in the Estimates, Atmosphere 11.

Lindhjem et al. 2011. Valuing lives saved from environment, transport and health policies. A meta-analysis. Risk Analysis 31(9) 1381-1407.

Maasikmets 2019. Determination of emission factors from anthropogenic particle sources for air emission and health impact assessment. DOI: 10.15159/emu.37.

OECD 2006. Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. Paris; OECD 2018. Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: further developments and policy use. Paris.

OECD 2012. Mortality risk valuation in environment, health and transport policies. Paris.

Orru et al. 2016. Well-being and environmental quality: Does pollution affect life satisfaction? Qual Life Res. 25(3) 699-705.

Paunu et al., 2021. Spatial distribution of residential wood combustion emissions in the Nordic countries: How well national inventories represent local emissions? Atmospheric Environment 264: 118712,

Picetti et al. 2022. Nitrate and nitrite contamination in drinking water and cancer risk: A systematic review with meta-analysis, Environmental Research. doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112988

Plejdrup et al. 2018. Spatial high-resolution distribution of emissions to air – SPREAD 2.0. AU DCE technical report no 131.

Rabl and Peuportier 1995. Impact Pathway Analysis: A tool for improving environmental decision processes, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15: 421–442; Friedrich and Bickel 2001. Environmental External Costs of Transport. Springer, Munich.

Rodriguez-Rey et al. 2022. To what extent the traffic restriction policies applied in Barcelona city can improve its air quality? Science of The Total Environment 807 Part 2, 150743.

Salomon et al. 2015. Disability weights for the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Lancet Global Health 3

Salkever 1995. Updated estimates of earnings benefits from reduced exposure of children to environmental lead. Environmental Research 70:1-6.

Soret et al. 2014. The potential impacts of electric vehicles on air quality in the urban areas of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain). Atmospheric Environment 99, 51-63;

Weyer et al. 2001. Municipal drinking water nitrate level and cancer risk in older women: The Iowa women’s health study,  Epidemiology 12(3) 327–338.

WHO 2013. Recommendations for concentration–response functions for cost–benefit analysis of particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. HRAPIE (Health risks of air pollution in Europe), Copenhagen.

WHO 2021. Global air quality guidelines, Bonn: European Centre for Environment and Health.